-
Los Angeles judges handle conflicting appellate precedent differently. Trellis’s study of PAGA rulings shows varied reasoning, underscoring how attorneys can research judicial patterns, tailor arguments, and assess litigation uncertainty. Read More
-
Judges’ elections often lack vital candidate information, leaving voters uninformed. The Trellis Judicial Voter Guide consolidates judges’ data to empower voters, aligning with Trellis’s mission to enhance legal accessibility. Read More
-
Attorneys can now use state trial court data to find successful motions, research judges and opposing counsel, and support their drafting, all within Microsoft 365 Copilot. Trellis, the legal research platform and authoritative litigation data layer for state trial courts, today announced its integration with Microsoft 365 Copilot as part of Microsoft’s Copilot for Legal… Read More
·
-
California’s judicial elections pose challenges for voters due to the absence of party labels and limited candidate information. Evaluating judges requires examining trial court records for insights into their performance and decision-making. Read More
-
Trellis investigates claim stacking in California labor and employment lawsuits, finding that pairing intent-based claims with objective claims increases recovery odds—but it comes with a price. Read More
Request a demo
Get a personalized walkthrough. See how Trellis gives you the edge in every case.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay informed with the latest litigation insights, legal trends, and Trellis updates.